Blanket Suspension of IBC- Will Hurt Genuinely Affected Lenders

Home     Articles      Blanket Suspension of IBC- Will Hurt Genuinely Affected Lenders

Blanket Suspension of IBC- Will Hurt Genuinely Affected Lenders

April 23, 2020

Blanket Suspension of IBC- Will Hurt Genuinely Affected Lenders
Blanket Suspension of IBC- Will Hurt Genuinely Affected Lenders

Since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in India, there has been call-out in relation to whether the government of India would alter the operation of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“IBC”). On March 24, 2020, the Union Finance Minister announced that the central government is considering the suspension of Sections 7, 9 and 10 of the IBC which deals with initiation of insolvency proceedings against corporate debtors by financial and operational creditors, in an attempt to prevent companies from being forced into insolvency proceedings for defaults owing to the pandemic. It is now heard that the Union Cabinet has cleared a proposal from the Corporate Affairs Ministry to give companies relief from insolvency for the next six months IBC which shall be notified shortly.

Please see below our views on the proposed amendment:

  • The proposed suspension of insolvency proceedings for six months will hit both financial and operational creditors. In fact, the government should consider suspending insolvency against companies which have defaulted during the lockdown period and thereafter for a period of six months. A blanket suspension shall impact cases which are chronic in nature. It may be noted that the government has already rightly raised the threshold for invoking insolvency under the IBC to Rs 1 crore from the current Rs 1 lakh with a view to prevent triggering of such proceedings against small and medium enterprises that are facing currently the heat of coronavirus pandemic.
  • The IBC is not just a enforcement tool, it is also the only way and binding mechanism that a company can go to in case it wants to restructure its debts and get a breathing period during which debt enforcement against it.
  • The Government should also consider, after the suspension period, amending section 29A of the IBC for allowing the Promoters to participate in the resolution plan otherthan willful defaulters as this section prevents existing promoters, who may have defaulted due to the conditions caused by Covid-19, from retaining control of the debtor.
  • In fact, suspension of Section 9 (Operational Creditor) may still be fine but suspension of Section 7 will be a bad call as it may impact financial institutions badly which eventually involves public money.
  • In fact, the government should work with RBI for issuing guidelines to the financial institutions for calling insolvency against any corporate debtor to factor in the impact of Covid 19 rather than a blanket ban.
  • A blanket ban on recourse through the IBC process will hurt genuinely affected lenders from recovering the debt owed to them.

Author: Prashant Jain, Co-Founder & Partner.

Disclaimer: The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. For any queries, the author can be reached at prashant@samistilegal.in.

Updated as on April 23, 2020

Image generation credits: https://www.canva.com/templates/

Join Our List To Stay In Touch

Leave your email id to receive regular updates on
corporate law changes that have impact on businesses.

     

    As per The Bar Council of India Rules and The Advocates Act, 1961, an advocate cannot approach his/her client or advertise or promote his profession by way of advertisements or solicitation. Thus the materials on this website are intended for informational purposes only. The materials on this website are neither intended to be, nor should they be interpreted as, legal advice or opinion. The reader should not consider this information to be an invitation to an attorney client relationship, should not rely on information presented here for any purpose, and should always seek the legal advice of counsel in the appropriate jurisdiction. Transmission and receipt of the information in this site and/or communication with the Samisti Legal LLP (“Samisti Legal / Firm”) via e-mail/ chat / blog or any other mode is not intended to solicit or create, and does not create, an attorney-client relationship between Samisti Legal and any person or entity. The information provided under this website is solely available at your request for informational purposes only, should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement…

    By accessing and using this site, the user expressly agrees with, and acknowledges, the following:

    • The user wishes to gain more information about Samisti Legal for his/her/its own information and use.
    • The user has not received any unsolicited invitation from Samisti Legal or any of its members or authorized representatives to view this website.
    • There has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever to the user from Samisti Legal or any of its members or any authorized representative to solicit any work, including through this website.
    • The information about Samisti Legal is provided to the user only on his/her/its specific request, and any information obtained or materials downloaded from this website is completely at the user’s own volition.
    • Samisti Legal assumes no liability for the interpretation and/or use of the information contained or referred to on this website, nor does it offer a warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied.